![]() |
![]() |
| Home | News | Technologies | Journal | Forum | Conference | Advertisement | Contacts | ðóññêèé | / | english |
|
|
The Marcellus shale gas exploration rush that has washed over Pennsylvania has
created concerns over how hydraulic fracturing impacts local water supplies.A single well hydrofracture in the Marcellus may require two million to five
million gallons of fracturing fluid, of which 25 percent to 100 percent may be
returned to the surface as "flowback" or "produced water." Historically, flowback
and produced water has traditionally gone to metals-precipitation plants, where
metals and items are removed. The fluid that leaves the plant is clean salt brine,
which has gone to sewage treatment plants where the salt is not removed, but diluted
with treated sewage and discharged to the rivers.
In the past, this was never an environmental concern as the salt levels were
very low and did not harm the environment. However, the sharp rise in Marcellus
shale drilling in recent years means that the amount of water from shale gas operations
being released into state waters would grow from a trickle to a tidal wave.
Fountain Quail Water Management, a Fort Worth, Texas-based subsidiary of Calgary-based
Aqua-Pure Ventures Inc., recently partnered with Eureka Resources of Williamsport,
Pa., to offer wastewater recycling to shale gas drillers in Pennsylvania.
Last month, Eureka opened its expanded 60,000-square foot water treatment facility
in Williamsport, which will be capable of recycling up to 200,000 gallons of wastewater
every day.
Fountain Quail's technology, originally developed by Aqua-Pure for use in northern
Alberta's oil sands, offers a cost-effective solution for recycling wastewater
in the Marcellus.
"Our recycling technology is achieving results that many people in the industry
thought were impossible," said Brent Halldorson, Fountain Quail's chief operating
officer. "Our evaporators are capable of producing pure distilled water, regardless
of the feed composition."
The great challenge with treating flowback wastewater from shale wells is the
variability of chemicals in the water. Current methods for treating wastewater,
including membranes and ion exchanges, work when treating water with consistent
levels of specific contaminants. The variability requires machinery to be constantly
cleaned, recalibrated or for treatment to fail altogether. Water in the early
stage flowback is likely very contaminated, while later flowback will typically
have more salt it picks up from the ground.
Halldorson said the long-term solution may be a mix of onsite recycling and centralized
treatment of wastewater, but the economics and decision of regulators in each
state will determine that mix. In Pennsylvania, the company is releasing treated
water back into rivers but also offering it to producers for use in fracturing
wells. CommentsFor posting your message please login or register |
|
| Home | News | Technologies | Journal | Forum | Conference | Advertisement | Contacts |
| All rights reserved Material from the site can be used with author's agreement only |
Galleria Tower 1 2700 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 1400 |
Houston Texas 77056 USA Òåëåôîí:+1 281 657 3300 E-mail: cttimes@cttimes.org |
Ðàçðàáîòêà ñàéòà: Âåá-ñòóäèÿ Àëåêñàíäðà Ðåòþõèíà |